Edit Page
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
The Wikipedia Aristotelians response to this argument is to induce ''Infinite regress'' by proposing that the [[Pattern or design]] dichotomy must not be assumed, but then not making it clear what are we then to assume. Leaving questions open ended risks '''Infinite regression''' - a formal fallacy. |
The Wikipedia Aristotelians response to this argument is to induce ''Infinite regress'' by proposing that the [[Pattern or design]] dichotomy must not be assumed, but then not making it clear what are we then to assume. Leaving questions open ended risks '''Infinite regression''' - a formal fallacy. |
||
− | === notes === |
||
− | http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/kropotkin/directactionenv.html |
||
− | |||
− | There can be no doubt that species may become greatly modified through the direct action of environment. I have some excuse for not having formerly insisted more strongly on this head in my Origin of Species, as most of the best facts have been observed since its publication. --- Darwin, Life and Letters, iii. 232 |
||
=== Links Source === |
=== Links Source === |