(Adding categories) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIBJ1wVqCeU |
+ | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIBJ1wVqCeU free will issue |
| + | |||
| + | === Van Till === |
||
| + | Bahnsen and Van Till presuppositionalists for some reason failed to notice that Calvinism is a grand tautological banality. My own theory is that the tautological bafoonism that undergrids Greek philosophy Calving studied and absorbed . This theory needs support |
||
| + | |||
| + | Van Till did not notice that Hegel formulated [[Meaningless sentence]]s and absorbed some of Hegel's nonsense into his philosophy. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Rhetorical tautologies are extremely dangerous because the tautological structure of the argument is indisputable and the conclusion thus a non-sequitur. |
||
[[Category:Calvinism]] |
[[Category:Calvinism]] |
||
Revision as of 05:13, 10 April 2014
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIBJ1wVqCeU free will issue
Van Till
Bahnsen and Van Till presuppositionalists for some reason failed to notice that Calvinism is a grand tautological banality. My own theory is that the tautological bafoonism that undergrids Greek philosophy Calving studied and absorbed . This theory needs support
Van Till did not notice that Hegel formulated Meaningless sentences and absorbed some of Hegel's nonsense into his philosophy.
Rhetorical tautologies are extremely dangerous because the tautological structure of the argument is indisputable and the conclusion thus a non-sequitur.