http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIBJ1wVqCeU free will issue
Van Til
Bahnsen and Van Til presuppositionalists, for some reason failed to notice that Calvinism is a grand tautological banality. My own theory is that the tautological bafoonism that undergrids Greek philosophy Calvin studied and absorbed . This theory needs support.
Van Till did not notice that Hegel formulated Meaningless sentences and excatly what nonsense was absorbed into his philosophy from Hegel needs further study. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(rhetoric)
Rhetorical tautologies are extremely dangerous because the tautological structure of the argument is indisputable and the conclusion thus a non-sequitur.
Links
http://www.wayoflife.org/free_ebooks/the_calvinism_debate.php
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2013/03/whats-wrong-with-calvinism/
http://fromtheheartofpastorkenny.blogspot.com/2008/02/tautology-of-calvinsim.html