Edit Page
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=topic/talk.origins/cEb2rxT5qiE#!topic/talk.origins/cEb2rxT5qiE |
https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=topic/talk.origins/cEb2rxT5qiE#!topic/talk.origins/cEb2rxT5qiE |
||
β | :"......If you take the time to read Dawkins very closely (and I have), |
+ | :"......If you take the time to read Dawkins very closely (and I have), |
+ | ***following his context,*** he does not actually say or admit that |
||
+ | he himself accepts, along with science, existence of an appearance of |
||
design. What he actually says, is, IF anyone claims to see an |
design. What he actually says, is, IF anyone claims to see an |
||
appearance of design THEN it must be a by-product of the power of |
appearance of design THEN it must be a by-product of the power of |
||
Line 79: | Line 81: | ||
He concludes that said appearance is an illusion, which provides him |
He concludes that said appearance is an illusion, which provides him |
||
and his colleagues the safe harbor of being able to say "we don't see |
and his colleagues the safe harbor of being able to say "we don't see |
||
β | it." ............" When you read Dawkins closely, this is what he is saying |
+ | it." ............" When you read Dawkins closely, this is what he is saying |
+ | |||