m (1 revision) |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Under the semantic object NS(which has no meaning) we have a collection of muddled nonsense from ID, YEC(Ken Ham) and atheist. |
Under the semantic object NS(which has no meaning) we have a collection of muddled nonsense from ID, YEC(Ken Ham) and atheist. |
||
| + | |||
| + | === Links === |
||
| + | |||
| + | http://media.premier.org.uk/unbelievable/22d8050f-6511-467b-9128-013c51e6221b.mp3 Meyer debate |
||
[[Category:TauTology]] |
[[Category:TauTology]] |
||
Revision as of 13:24, 9 February 2014
video debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6lT6xdcLGM&feature=related
He said : NS(1 ? ) mimics intelligence
Notes
Question to Stephen: If NS1(Naming Conventions) can mimic intelligence , could it also mimic stupidity ?
Under the semantic object NS(which has no meaning) we have a collection of muddled nonsense from ID, YEC(Ken Ham) and atheist.
Links
http://media.premier.org.uk/unbelievable/22d8050f-6511-467b-9128-013c51e6221b.mp3 Meyer debate